(published 12/1/99) When Feminists Favor Flawed Views by Mischa Gelman Feminists often get accused of being man-haters. While this may be true once in a good while, it obviously is simply a rhetorical technique by those who oppose equality of the genders. A bigger problem is the desire by many feminists for male-emulation - it is not that they are overly critical of men, it is that they are overly critical of women. Instead of pointing out the ways men are inferior and should learn from women (and as a guy, I've noticed tons), they deride traditional feminine characteristics and roles as inferior, stating a need to copy guys. They tell women to be more vocal and more aggressive when they should be telling men to be less aggressive and more like women. Instead of telling guys to go be househusbands, they scorn anyone who does housework (except maids, since that's "work.") When a woman leaves her job and dares to stay home nowadays, she gets looked down upon by many. As a result, less folks actually raise kids and make the home a nice place and more people serve as drones in the workplace, following the whims of their boss. Feminist writers Lyn Brown and Carol Gilligan say women have been raised badly, pressured by a "tyranny of the kind and nice." Why they consider this a big problem, I am not quite sure. I am more concerned that men are raised by the "tyranny of the cold-hearted and tyrannical." After all, shouldn't everyone be raised to be nice? Am I missing something in seeing this in a positive light? Women should be glad they are taught to be nice and kind. Women are allowed to express any emotion without a real problem - in fact, if they hide it inside, they are seen as cold and distant. Men, on the other hand, are supposed to express, or be capable of even, only two emotions according to American culture - lust and anger. Even though research shows that married man are happier than single men and benefit from marriage in terms of happiness more than women, the media tells us guys aren't capable of love, certainly not on the scale women are supposed to be capable of it. Women are taught to be social and develop friendships, while men are taught to go it alone - by wishing to make male socialization the ideal, we downplay the importance of community and friends and encourage a society of loners. One startling note is that Lifetime, a station that has provided reruns of some good comedies and dramas like Designing Women and The Commish, calls itself "Television for Women." What, guys aren't capable of enjoying humor and good acting? These advertisers encourage the image men wouldn't like such things, despite the presence of realistic male characters in those very same shows. It is not just the media that serves up these convoluted images. Afterall, they have existed for thousands of years, long before Lifetime Television. A boy growing up in this country doesn't have to read books , magazines and newspapers, watch TV and movies or listen to music to know what is expected of guys. He just has to go to schools. Starting in elementary school, we were taught being macho is good and got criticized if we wanted to play with Care Bears in addition to Transformers and GI Joe. If we hadn't properly incorporated the typical stereotype by high school, we get labeled as fags, homos, sissies, wimps and all other kinds of creative insults. Heaven forbid you should show feelings and act human. As a result of this social teaching, women wind up kind and nice more often. They commit far fewer crimes. They spend more time with their kids. They serve as caregivers for relatives with health problems more frequently - and when caregiving are less likely to be isolated and more likely to utilize outside supports. They are less likely to internalize emotions, leading to earlier death and increased alcohol and drug abuse on the part of men. These are things we should emulate, not shy away from, and certainly not denigrate as some kind of tyranny. Feminists should be asking men to change and leave good enough alone rather than asking women to change. Mischa Gelman has no problem with feminism, just with some feminists who care more for a flawed male identity than for a good female identity.